The short answer
Nutri&Co scores 4.6 out of 5 from 5,626 reviews, one of the largest volumes of the brands we have measured, and it replies to 94% of negative reviews. Our price checks give a more nuanced verdict: it is almost always the dearest per gram of active ingredient, 121% more on magnesium, 46% on whey, 115% on collagen. Two real strengths partly compensate: the Cologne List for creatine, and the only truly specific formulas.
What our comparisons measured
| Comparison | Nutri&Co’s position | Measured gap |
|---|---|---|
| Magnesium | second to last of eight | 0.332 EUR per 100 mg against 0.150, or +121% |
| Whey | second out of three | 60.15 EUR per kilo of protein against 41.23, or +46% |
| Marine collagen | the dearest in the table | 171.67 EUR per kilo against 79.80, or +115% |
| Spirulina | dearer per 100 g | 33.17 EUR against 21.96 for the best French spirulina, or +51% |
| Zinc | fifth out of six | 0.22 EUR per day against 0.12 at Nutrimea |
| Creatine | equivalent on price | 9.97 EUR per 100 g, in the leading trio |
| Intimate flora probiotic | the cheapest with identified strains | 0.66 EUR per day, against 0.63 at Nutrimea with no strain code and 1.33 at Dynveo |
The trend is clear and it is quantified: in five comparisons out of seven, Nutri&Co is the dearest for an equal amount of active ingredient. This is not a judgement, it is an average of price checks.
The two times this extra cost is explained
The Cologne List for creatine
Its creatine appears on the Cologne List, a list of products analysed for cross-contamination with banned substances. For a competing athlete, this is the only argument in our whole creatine research that justifies paying more than the price per gram. As the three creatines compared are otherwise identical (100% monohydrate, same Creapure label), it is even the only selection criterion left.
The only truly specific formula
On the intimate flora probiotic, Nutri&Co is the only one of the brands compared to offer Lactobacillus crispatus CCFM1110, the strain whose dominance characterises a balanced vaginal microbiota, naming it with its code. And, for once, it is one of the two cheapest products in the comparison at 0.66 EUR per day. When the brand formulates for a specific use rather than rolling out a generic, the result is good.
One point that bothered us
On omega-3, its page shows its three formats at the same price, which is impossible. We therefore could not calculate its price per gram of EPA+DHA and the product is absent from the price ranking in our omega-3 comparison, while remaining in the composition table, where its data is solid. The same treatment as for the other brands in this case.
Worth noting in passing, and to its credit: on these omega-3, it guarantees a TOTOX index below 26 until the best-before date, whereas its competitor states a value measured only at the end of production. The commitment is more informative.
What customers say
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.6 / 5 |
| Number of reviews | 5,626, of which 2,004 over twelve months |
| 5 stars | 79% |
| 4 stars | 11% |
| 3 stars | 4% |
| 2 stars | 2% |
| 1 star | 4% |
| Replies to negative reviews | 94%, within a week |
On the positive side: the quality of the formulas and the brand’s seriousness come up constantly, along with the absence of artificial sweeteners, which our price checks partly confirm, its spirulina being sweetened with stevia and not sucralose, and its whey too.
On the negative side: occasional shipping delays and packaging defects, a few delivery difficulties, and a reported disappointment with the results of a sun supplement despite its marketing promise.
The 94% reply rate to negative reviews is the most reliable sign in this table: it is a verifiable service indicator, whereas the average rating can be read in several ways.
Who it is for, in practice
Yes, if you compete and the anti-doping guarantee of the Cologne List matters, or if you want a specific formula rather than a generic: the intimate flora probiotic is the best example.
No, if you buy magnesium, collagen or spirulina: on these three products, you pay 51 to 115% more for an identical active ingredient. The detail is in each comparison linked above.
How we put this review together
We have not tested these products and we do not claim to have. This review draws on two verifiable sources.
Our own price checks. This brand has appeared in our comparisons: magnesium, whey, creatine, marine collagen, zinc, spirulina, vitamin D, omega-3, probiotics. Each time, the price was checked on its official page and converted to the price of the active ingredient (the kilo of protein, 100 mg of magnesium, the gram of EPA+DHA) and the ingredients list copied. It is this material that lets us say whether a brand is expensive or not, rather than just feeling it.
Aggregated customer reviews, checked on Trustpilot on 24/09/2026: rating, volume, star breakdown, recurring themes and the brand’s reply rate to negative reviews. A customer review measures the buying experience (delivery, service, taste), not how effective a supplement is. The two questions are distinct and we keep them separate.
Our sources
- Official Nutri&Co pages, viewed on 23 and 24/09/2026: doses, labels, formats, prices and ingredients lists for seven products.
- Trustpilot, Nutri&Co page, checked on 24/09/2026.
- Our comparisons of magnesium, whey, creatine, marine collagen, zinc, spirulina, omega-3 and the intimate flora probiotic.